-
1 persuasive precedent
юр. убедительный прецедент (прецедент, который не является судебным решением высшей инстанции и которому суд не обязан следовать, но тем не менее следует по причине аналогичности ситуации и разумности применения данного решения)Syn:See:* * * -
2 persuasive precedent
Юридический термин: убедительный прецедент -
3 precedent
[̘. ̈n.ˈpresɪdənt]authoritative precedent авторитетный прецедент authoritative precedent заслуживающий доверия прецедент binding precedent обязывающий прецедент precedent предшествующий; condition precedent предварительное условие condition precedent предварительное условие declaratory precedent деклараторный прецедент judicial precedent судебный прецедент original precedent первичный прецедент persuasive precedent юр. убедительный прецедент precedent предшествующий, предварительный precedent предшествующий; condition precedent предварительное условие precedent предшествующий precedent прецедент precedent судебный прецедент -
4 precedent
1. прил.общ. предшествующий2. сущ.юр. прецедент (решение суда, служащее образцом при решении аналогичных дел в системе англосаксонского права; в системе английского права формулируется как решение высших судов, имеющее обязательную силу как для них самих, так и для низших судов; на практике это означает, что решения палаты лордов не могут игнорироваться нижестоящими судами; решения Апелляционного суда должны применяться в дальнейшем всеми судами, кроме палаты лордов; Высокий суд выносит решения, которые обязательны для все судов, кроме палаты лордов и Апелляционного суда; прецеденты публикуются в специальных сборниках, как правило, называющихся law reports; институты договорного права, ответственности за нарушение обязательств регулируются исключительно прецедентами)to constitute [create, establish\] a precedent — создавать прецедент
Syn:See:binding precedent, persuasive precedent, Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom -
5 precedent
̘. ̈n.ˈpresɪdənt
1. сущ. прецедент without precedent ≈ беспрецедентный, не имеющий прецедента there's no precedent for this ≈ это беспрецедентный случай to set/create/establish a precedent ≈ создать прецедент to invoke a precedent ≈ сослаться на прецедент
2. прил.
1) предшествующий, предыдущий precedent chapter ≈ предыдущая глава Syn: previous, former
2) превосходящий precedent in nobility ≈ превосходящий в знатности (судебный) прецедент - to set /to create/ a * создать прецедент - to invoke a * сослаться на прецедент - without * беспрецедентный, не имеющий прецедента, беспримерный, небывалый - there's no * for this это беспрецедентный случай предшествующий - * events предшествующие события - * chapter предшествующая глава - conditions * предварительные условия authoritative ~ авторитетный прецедент authoritative ~ заслуживающий доверия прецедент binding ~ обязывающий прецедент ~ предшествующий;
condition precedent предварительное условие condition ~ предварительное условие declaratory ~ деклараторный прецедент judicial ~ судебный прецедент original ~ первичный прецедент persuasive ~ юр. убедительный прецедент precedent предшествующий, предварительный ~ предшествующий;
condition precedent предварительное условие ~ предшествующий ~ прецедент ~ судебный прецедентБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > precedent
-
6 advisory precedent
юр. = persuasive precedent
См. также в других словарях:
Persuasive precedent — (also persuasive authority) is precedent or other legal writing that is related to the case at hand but is not a binding precedent on the court under common law legal systems such as English law. However, persuasive authority may guide the judge… … Wikipedia
persuasive precedent — noun A precedent set in a court that has no precedence over another but whose decisions are considered to be sufficiently useful that they may be used, although they are not binding until used by a superior court … Wiktionary
Precedent — In common law legal systems, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body adopts when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. DescriptionThe precedent on an issue is … Wikipedia
precedent — pre·ce·dent 1 /pri sēd ənt, pre səd / adj [Middle French, from Latin praecedent praecedens, present participle of praecedere to go ahead of, come before]: prior in time, order, arrangement, or significance see also condition precedent at… … Law dictionary
persuasive authority — See judicial dicta; precedent … Ballentine's law dictionary
Binding precedent — In law, a binding precedent (also mandatory precedent or binding authority) is a precedent which must be followed by all lower courts under common law legal systems. In English law it is usually created by the decision of a higher court, such as… … Wikipedia
Stare decisis — (Anglo Latin pronunciation: /ˈstɛəri dɨˈsaɪsɨs]) is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedents established by prior decisions. The words originate from the phrasing of the principle in the Latin maxim Stare decisis et … Wikipedia
Liversidge v. Anderson — [1942] A.C. 206 is an important and landmark case in English law which concerned the relationship between the courts and the state, and in particular the assistance that the judiciary should give to the executive in times of national emergency.… … Wikipedia
Concurring opinion — Legal opinions Judicial opinions Majority opinion Dissenting opinion Plurality opinion Concurring opinion Memorandum opinion This box: view · opinion by one o … Wikipedia
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ArgueDate=March 28 ArgueYear=2006 DecideDate=June 29 DecideYear=2006 FullName=Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense; John D. Altenburg, Jr., Appointing… … Wikipedia
Daniel v. Waters — Court United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Full case name Joseph C. Daniel, Jr., et al., v. Hugh Waters, Chairman, Textbook Commission of the State of Tennessee, et al … Wikipedia